2023/03/15: adding more Settings for different resins, different default for different firmware version, added preliminary Review
2023/03/09: finally published
2023/03/05: first prints made, more info on Lychee Slicer, Prusa Slicer SLA, more on magnetic steel plate use, prints with or without support, closeup photos added
2022/11/29: added Drip Hook, still preparing the utilities to make first print
2022/11/26: Mono 4K arrived, preparing software pipeline (slicer, converters) and working place
2022/11/07: starting write-up
The past years I focused on Filament Deposition Manufacturing (FDM) / extrusion based 3D printing, and the time came to focus on MSLA resin based process as well.
My main use case a small pieces, like custom pulleys and idlers – precise parts, such as:
The Anycubic Photon Mono 4K seemed like a good choice to start with:
build volume: 132 x 80 x 165 mm
resolution: XY 35μm, Z 50μm
6.1″ display with 4K resolution (3840×2400) display
monochromatic LCD (hence “Mono”), faster printer due shorter exposure
affordable with EUR 170-220 (2022/11)
no network, only USB drive printing
SLA Stereolithography – one beam/point light source
MSLA Mask Stereolithography Aparatus – one light source, masking what does not need to be printed
DLP Digital Light Processing – one image, each pixel controlled by micro mirror
I ordered 2022/11/22 for EUR 170 and received it 4 days later via Anycubic Store within Amazon, along with a few utilities like water wash resins, gloves, etc – ready to MSLA print.
FDM/FFF vs Resin
X, Y precision: 100μm Z precision: 50μm minimal structure: 200-600μm1) minimal post-processing minimal toxicity of filament print duration based on printed volume large scale prints affordable 1kg filament EUR 15-30 mixed materials2)
X, Y precision: 35-75μm Z precision: 30-50μm minimal structure: 30-50μm extensive post-processing severe toxicity of resin print duration based on print Z height only large scale prints require expensive printers 1kg resin EUR 30-803) single material
depends on nozzle diameter
multiple printheads/hotends required, e.g. IDEX, tool changer, material changer
Anycubic sold water wash resins at 22-27 EUR/kg 2023/03 (black, white, clear, grey and waterblue)
layer height: 0.05mm / 50μm
exposure time: 2s
light-off time: 0.5s
bottom layer count: 6
bottom exposure time: 40s
lifting distance: 6mm
lifting speed: 4mm/s
retract speed: 6mm/s
anti-aliasing level: 1
file formats: pwma (proprietary)
Photon Workshop on Linux
My development environment is Linux, and as of 2022/11 there is no Linux Photon Workshop, the name of the slicer needed to slice for Mono 4K; but you can run it via Wine (a Windows compatibility wrapper):
I tried my xyzHollowCalibrationCubeV2 and used auto hollow feature which defaults to 2mm thickness:
This seems to work but is not ideal. The Photon Workshop reveals that Photon Mono 4K supports only .pmwa format, which as it turns out, is PWS format just with the extension .pmwa to avoid mixing up different PWS files for different machines, as the pixel-based slices are hardware dependent now as resolution of the display is set.
Chitubox for Linux
Chitubox Slicer is available for Linux natively and supports a variety of SLA printers, also the Mono 4K:
I also used the auto hollow feature, which defaulted to 1.2mm wall thickness.
Lychee Slicer for Linux
I ended up with the Lychee Slicer which is available for Linux as well, which contains some annoying advertising to wait for when slicing or exporting various formats, but functionality-wise it it is more intuitive than Chitubox Slicer.
Prusa SLA Slicer
As mentioned, the Photon Mono 4K has its own proprietary file-format PWS file to print with, with a particular file extension to indicate which Anycubic MSLA device it is sliced for:
Layer Image Encoding
Prusa Slicer slices also for MSLA, it’s own .sl1 format, just a ZIP file with a list of PNG files per slice, in order to convert .sl1 to PWS/.pwma another tool is required:
UVtools, it can read and write many SLA image formats, incl. PhotonWorkshop (.pw*) file-formats
another approach could be (as of 2022/12 not yet) to just convert sl1 to .photon with SL1toPhoton command line tool, and extend functionality to support PWS/.pwma as well
alternatively uv3dp supports pw0 and pws files, but struggles with new(er) PWS files like .pwma
.photon/ctb/cbddlp vs .pw*
.photon (and ctb/cbddlp) is an older file format, whereas newer Photon Workshop (PW) has PWS and PW0 encoded images as layers – so far the format seems reverse engineered and somewhat documented via UVTools: PhotonWorkshopFormat.cs
Anycubic Photon Mono
PWS vs SL1
Some deeper dive into the available metadata of PWS vs SL1 format:
does not report layer counts, but be determined from the amount of enclosed .png files
display_pixels_x / bedshape[x] * 1000 [μm]
MSLA resin printers are quite closed systems without much information of the hardware, firmware, and additional having their own proprietary file formats which contain the layer images.
For the Anycubic Photon Mono 4K is an open source firmware available, Turbo Resin – which gave me a good reason to get this 3D printer. Along with it, the hardware has been pretty much reversed engineered.
Turbo Resin (2022/12)
– PW0/PWMA format
– PW0/PWMA & CTB format
Custom MSLA Slicer
Pondering on a custom MSLA slicer:
automatic hollowing of solids at certain wall thickness
automatic support generation, outside and inside (after hollowing)
drain hole generation
command line interface (CLI)
external preview of sliced part
supporting sl1 and pws/pw0 as a start
command line interface (CLI)
Open MSLA Format
Unfortunately there is no open (M)SLA format, each manufacturer kind of does its own, whereas G-code .gcode has some conformity, although G-code in general is also machine specific has it has absolute positioning, which differ from machine to machine, but at least G-code is easy to compose unlike proprietary (M)SLA file formats.
SL1 format by Prusa Engineering is a simple ZIP file which contains:
config.ini: irrelevant info
prusaslicer.ini: info about printer (bed size), pixel density, and many slicer settings
*.png: enumerated image files per slice in PNG format
and thereby is open enough for my taste.
Requirements of Open MSLA Format
simple format for controller to decode
simple pixel data1)
simple preview image format1)
this is why PWS/PW0 or CTB fileformat use some simple RLE algorithm to compress pixel data
The Lychee Slicer gave 1h 15m print time, the printer itself showed 2h 15m; I used Anycubic White Water Wash Resin. I used automatic supports, and it printed 5 pieces successful, 3 pieces failed and only apprx. 4mm Z height were printed, interestingly all 3 failed pieces failed at the same Z height and broke off and stuck at the print plate.
I reprinted the 3 failed pieces at the same place, and this time they succeeded – which is strange as I suspected perhaps uneven light or some other positional inconsistency, but obviously the position did not matter, which is bad as I don’t know what caused the first failed print.
The curved bottoms (not directly printed but with diverse support pipes) already showing severe distortion while printing.
Update: It seems my office rooms aren’t warm enough, so the bed adhesion isn’t optimal as I read up in some forum posts. I tried to print a few other pieces, all failed the next day in the room with 15-19C° – the prints detached after 2-3mm height from the build plate. I moved it to another warmer room, warmed the resin on the radiator which helped.
The overall quality of the pieces is astonishing, no visible voxels or layers are seen, incredible quality for those prints which didn’t fail.
Yet the failure rate is still significant for my taste, so I need to pay close attention to room temperature, and other aspects:
The cause of the “delimination” isn’t clear yet to me, it seems the prints with proper support and elevated bottom printed better, but I need to confirm with more prints.
As a start I assembled a simple DIY curing station with a 5m UV LED strip and placed it inside a plastic cup, with some aluminium foil at the bottom and top lid:
I only cure for 4-5mins, longer exposure changes the white resin into yellowish tint, and indicates over curing.
Keeping Resin in the Vat
After a print, the resins needs to be filtered for impurities, such as partial cured pieces not attached to the part, with a funnel and filter into a cup or bottle, and then it can be poured back into the vat ready to print again.
One can leave the resin in the vat for weeks, if you stir the resin short before you print again – stirring the resin within the vat is not ideal, as one has to avoid to scratch or FEP film; yet there is no need to pour resin back into the bottle unless one changes the resin, like the brand or color.
I remixed an existing drip hook for Photon Mono to fit Photon Mono 4K, and make it easier to slide the bed on and off.
Additionally I’ve got a spring steel build plate 135x80mm with a magnetic base for EUR 10 (2022/12).
This turned out to be a good choice, the removal of the pieces is easy without additional tool.
the thickness of the adhesive magnet holding the plate required the optical Z endswitch to recalibrate, instead to move the sensor, I extended the light breaking piece with just a small piece of paper with a drop of glue – it was easier than 3d printing an extender for the entire sensor.
in my case the small handle of the plate scratches on the vat at the last 3-4mm height, therefore the entire plate needs to be slightly misaligned (just pushing one side while fastening the build plate) so the handle doesn’t touch the vat.
third party Anycubic Mono 4K vat like from Mega/Kingroon have a larger space, and don’t need any fiddling around therefore
the spring steel is sharp, it happened several times the single-use gloves being torn/cut while handling the plate
(One of) My Use Case
After a few days I aimed for the main use case of mine: printing custom pulleys.
As I printed them with Anycubic Water Wash White Resin without support, the “elephant foot” comes from the first 6 layers being cured for 40s as in my case, and the UV light refracting and curing more than meant to be, but I can neglect this.
(not yet tested)
print time per piece
print time for 1 piece
print time for 16 pieces
due the “elephant foot” the Z accuracy was off by 0.8mm, instead of 15.0mm it’s 14.2mm
when printing 16 pieces, it took 1h 30m for printing 15mm in Z, I could have printed ~28 pulleys on 132 x 80mm build plate, bringing print time for a piece down to 3m 10s
My own experience with different resins (to be extended):
Defaults V0.0.11 Firmware V0.11
Defaults V2.0.2 Firmware V0.16
White WATER WASH RESIN (Anycubic)
Clear Water Wash Resin (Resione)
Layer Thickness [μm]
Exposure Time [s]
2 .. 3
Exposure Off Time [s]
Bottom Exposure [s]
Z Lift Distance [mm]
Z Lift Speed [mm/s]
Z Retract Speed [mm/s]
UV Power [%]
50 .. 100
Distance, Speed & Retract Speed for – [BL] Bottom Layers – [NL] Normal Layers individually definable
– geometrical precise
– soft with 3s exposure – stiffer & brittle with 5s exposure – geometrical not precise (+0.2 .. 0.8mm in XYZ)
good prints for the price
lot’s of third party replacements (vat, FEP, etc)1)
alternatively Open Source firmware
nearly full reverse engineered hardware
this actually is quite important: popular machine raise a secondary market for replacements: future replacement of parts even when Anycubic ends support
newly bought machine had outdated firmware
updated firmware calculates wrong total print time, this is just sloppy
touchscreen unreliable (wrong position) ‘print’ vs ‘delete’, use a soft pencil
slow prints with default settings (1mm/s Z motion), not nearly at 50mm/h height as advertised
slicer print settings are ignored, only settings on the machine matter
advantage: once sliced the .pwma can be printed with different resins and settings changed on the machine only
disadvantage: one has to memorize or document settings for different resins, as it not stored in the .pwma file
It’s a low-cost entry level MSLA machine, Anycubic seems to care little about the software (2023/03) as the slicer as well the firmware are Minimal Viable Product (MVP) level, but aren’t mature or reliable at all. Given they sell 500K+ machines per year at least, investing to improve in the firmware would help 500,000 users.