Category Archives: Technology

MSLA Anycubic Photon Mono X2


  • 2023/07/25: published
  • 2023/06/13: adding my print settings to increase reliability
  • 2023/03/31: first prints performed
  • 2023/03/29: adding Formlabs 3/3L and Prusa SL1S as comparison
  • 2023/03/23: starting write-up


After my first steps with Anycubic Photon Mono 4K, an entry-level MSLA I also got a slightly larger Anycubic Photon Mono X2:

  • build volume: 196 x 122 x 200 mm (WxDxH)
  • resolution: XY 48μm, Z 50μm
  • 9.1″ display with 4K+ resolution (4096×2560) display
  • monochromatic LCD (hence “Mono”), faster printer due shorter exposure
  • affordable with EUR 300-350 (2023/03)
  • no network, only USB drive printing

I ordered at directly (EUR 350) 2023/03/24, and got it a week later.

Default Settings

Firmware V0.2.3
My Settings
My Settings
Bottom Layers651
Exposure Off [s]
Bottom Exposure [s]
Normal Exposure [s]
Transition Layers41010
Bottom Region
Bottom Layer [0] Rising Height [mm]3.04.0
Bottom Layer [0] Rising Speed [mm/s]1.0
Bottom Layer [0] Retract Speed [mm/s]1.0
Bottom Layer [1] Rising Height [mm]4.04.0 1)
Bottom Layer [1] Rising Speed [mm/s]
Bottom Layer [1] Retract Speed [mm/s]3.0
Normal Region
Normal Layer [0] Rising Height [mm]3.04.0
Normal Layer [0] Rising Speed [mm/s]1.0
Normal Layer [0] Retract Speed [mm/s]1.0
Normal Layer [1] Rising Height [mm]4.04.0 1)
Normal Layer [1] Rising Speed [mm/s]
Normal Layer [1] Retract Speed [mm/s]3.0
UV Light (not available)
  1. in Lychee Slicer the 2nd lift distance is the sum of [0] Rising Height 4.0mm + [1] Rising Height 4mm = “4.0mm > 8.0mm”:

After some prints I realized the 3mm/s or 180mm/min 2nd rising speed really decreased the reliability of prints I did, usually after bottom layers some models, especially fine structures, deliminated and I realized the transitioning needed to be longer and also reduce the 2nd rising speed, the retraction speed could stay as is. The slowed down the overall print time, but reliability is getting near to Mono 4K.

Various Resins

from Anycubic Web-Site (2023/04/02)

Mono 4K vs Mono X2 vs Mono M3 Max

The print area Mono 4K doubles nearly with Mono X2, and the Mono M3 Max (EUR 1000) additionally doubles the print area:

As pointed out previously, the print area with MSLA directly affects the print speed, the larger the build plate, the faster the print: more parts can be printed at the same time.

The Mono X2 is relatively new as of writing this blog-post, just released in late 2022, so the third party market has not yet taken off regarding spare vats, spring steel magnetic build plate, protective films and alike.

Update 2023/07: The Mono X2 already discontinued as M5 and M5S has been released.

Photon Mono X2 vs Creality LD-006: Details Matter

The main reason I prefered the Photon Mono X2 (EUR 350) over the Creality LD-006 (EUR 250) with the nearly same build-volume is that the LD-006 has a bad build-plate mount where resin is trapped near the screws – which makes cleaning and switching resins much harder:

Eventually either cured, dried or semi liquid resin trapped in there will contaminate your next prints – so a bad build plate design can ruin your prints eventually.

Slicer Support

Lychee Slicer 5.x and upward also supports the Mono X2 out of the box, whereas Prusa Slicer SLA slicer, as of 2.x series, does not slice to any but .sl1, and so requires a custom setting to add support for it indirectly then requires a tool like UVtools to convert to .pmx2 (Note: as of 2023/03 the output format is not working properly).

The native Photon Workshop slicer coming with the printer has no Linux support and only works via Wine “Windows” emulator, and is barely usable.

Printing 40x Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces 20mm cubes samples at once, and it took 1h45m (with default settings) with apprx. 30mm height, as some required support.

The pieces were overexposed, the bottom layers were significantly overexposed, the clear resin as well the white resin which came as 2nd batch – the defaults as recommended by Anycubic and consequently by Lychee Slicer 5.1.8 were not as good as Photon Mono 4K.

The default settings with 3mm/s or 180mm/min for 2nd lift speed caused multiple failed prints for me such as delimination, and I reduced it to 1.5mm/s or 90mm/min and increased transitioning layers from 4 to 10 – after that fine structures like those 40mm cube lattice prints came out quite well.

Photon Mono X2 Drip Hook

I highly recommend a drip hook, you want uncured resin easily drip over a period of 5-10min back into the vat, before you wash it off in water (when using water wash resin) or isopropyl alcohol (IPA).

Photon Mono X2 Drip Hook

Third Party Market

Photon Mono X2 compatibilitySpecifications
vatPhoton Mono X, Mono X 6K, Mono M3 Plus263 x 169 x 30 mm (outside max)
238 x 162 mm (inside)
steel build plateElegoo Saturn S (same LCD size)202 x 129 mm (min. 196 x 122mm)

Spring Steel Plate

I made two prints with the original build plate, and it was difficult to remove the prints without flexing and scratched the plate right away – the adhesion is good, too good actually. So it became clear, I also want a spring steel plate for it.

I’ve got a spring steel plate 202×128 mm from Aliexpress.

  • magnetic base: 2.2mm thick, slightly extends, 203x129mm
  • steel plate: 0.5mm thick, exact 202x128mm

so one has to compensate 2.5 – 3mm in Z height and adjust, speak extend, the Z-level probe. I just glued a black strip of paper, and then of course re-level the bed again afterwards.


The motherboard has two main chips:

  • ARM GD32F407
    • driving Z stepper motor with endstop (Z=0)
    • driving USB port
    • driving both LCDs via ASIC
  • EF2L 45L G1444B (ASIC)
    • driving monochrome LCD via MIPI DSI (not sure where the image buffer resides)
    • driving UI color LCD with touchscreen
Mono X2 motherboard

Preliminary Review Mono X2


  • good value for build size, but not features
  • mid-size build volume with 196 x 122 x 200 mm (WxDxH)
  • no cover sensor (can be on or off and still prints)
  • available replacement of parts (LCD, vat, build-plate)


  • no Wi-Fi (only USB Stick)
  • surprisingly noisy with fans while printing
  • firmware doesn’t allow to change UV light intensity
  • default settings are not giving reliable prints1)
  • very simple firmware & UI
  • no flex build plate
  • no upper endstop (you can ramm the build-plate into the plate on top)
  • no sensor for running plate against cured remains in vat2), that would require more advanced firmware
  • cheap USB memory stick (breaks after a few days, data corruption)
  1. using original Anycubic Water Washable Resin +
  2. newer printers (2023) have load cell to measure counter force, and prevent build-plate to run with force against vat and LCD underneath. Update 2023/05: Anycubic released Mono M5S (2023/05) which has a load-cell sensor, but reviews are mixed.
Photon #4 (Mono X2) & Photon #1 & #2 (Mono 4K): additional handle on top, and labels on cover and body


Printing Procedure

Let me take the chance to describe my MSLA resin printing procedure – if you are newcomer you might like to read it in a concise way.

  • resin printing (as in 2023) is still a messy procedure at the consumer and prosumer level as well
  • the moment the print is finished, you need to remove the build-plate or flex steel plate, no matter which, the piece(s) still have resin on it, which likely will drip on the printer and especially around the vat is the most critical area:
    • by any means prevent any resin to come under the vat
    • don’t touch the underside of the vat with hands or gloves, unless you have a fresh piece of sheet of paper towel or equivalent
    • if you must clean the underside of the vat – and if you do you already screwed up when this happens – clean it first thoroughly, and after that the side of the vat and other part of the printer
    • prevent any resin to get on the LCD or protective layers on the LCD, wipe it away right away
    • cured resin is difficult to remove, especially from softer surfaces like plastic – so I have the habit to remove all resin outside of the vat right away
  • clean your gloves with pieces of paper towel, to prevent to further spoil your equipment you grab as next:
    • clean gloves when handling the build plate
    • I keep the same gloves for multiply prints or a 1-2 weeks as I clean them with paper towels right away (2-3 times per print: whenever I touch the 3d printer, the gloves are clean)
  • when removing the pieces from the build plate, things will become messy, no matter what
  • washing the piece(s) off in a water container as I use only water wash resin
    • 1st wash container: I dip the pieces with the build plate into the container, my gloves don’t get wet or touch resin
    • 2nd wash container: I remove the flex build plate, and dip it with the pieces still on the plate into the 2nd container – dipping in and out several times
  • then I remove the pieces from the flex build plate, by flexing the build plate or use a metal scrapper, and they drop into a small container with layers of paper towels where they dry a bit (10-30min) – I don’t touch the pieces with my gloves, I only touch the build plate
    • cleaning the build plate with paper towels dry, mount it back on the printer
    • cleaning the flex build plate with paper towels and attach it to the build plate
  • no cured remains in vat: using the plastic scrapper to push on the vat’s bottom softly, and move through the vat slowly to see if there are remains attached to the vat bottom, those needs to be removed otherwise at next print the build plate will push it unto the LCD and potentially damage it – high risk to damage the MSLA printer severely, such as puncture FEP of the vat and leak resin all over
    • if there are cured remains on the bottom FEP which I can’t remove with the plastic scrapper (large enough to pick out), then
      • either I expose the entire plate for 10-20s, and remove then a full cured layer of the entire area, this removes all small remains
      • if there are small floating pieces, then I empty the vat off the resin by pouring through a metal or paper filter (keeps back remove all cured remains) back into the bottle – this is time consuming and messy as you need to clean funnel and metal filter again
  • if I have printed pieces with small holes where water might still be captured, I take a piece of paper towel and wrap it and shake it fast in my hands – I have seen people blowing compressed air on the cured pieces, this makes sense if you produce many pieces in series frequently
  • 2nd stage curing of the pieces in UV chamber:
    • white/black/grey resin 1-3 mins
    • clear resin 2 mins max
  • further resting the piece(s) for 1-2 hours to dry further

And I leave the resin in the vat, and let the vat stay on the printer for days – no refilling back and forth to and from bottles, unless I know I have cured fragments in the vat, then I empty the vat with metal or paper filter back into the bottle and clean it with paper towels thoroughly as mentioned above already.

Keep everything around MSLA printer as clean as possible.

Consumer MSLA vs Professional SLA

When trying to compare consumer MSLA and professional SLA like from Formlabs you might just look at the print size or build volume:

but also look at other aspects:

Photon MonoPrusa SL1SFOrmlabs Form 3, 3L
PricingEUR 200-1,000EUR 2,000EUR 5,000-10,000
TechnologyMSLAMSLALow Force SLA
Exposure TechnologyUV light with monochrome LCD (4K)UV light & monochrome LCD (2K)UV laser
Automaticsresin levelresin level
resin dispenser
resin heating
level indication
Next Layer Methodpeeling with 2 stage raisingpeeling by tiltingpeeling & wiping
Removal of Partmessymessy without CW1
OK with CW1
messy without Form Wash
OK with Form Wash3)
Cleaning Partmessymessy without CW1
OK with CW1
messy without Form Wash
OK with Form Wash3)
Post Curing Partrequiredrequiredoptional
Slicing Software★★☆☆☆ Photon Workshop
★★★★☆ Lychee Slicer
★★★★☆ Prusa Slicer★★★★★ PreForm
Print Speed★★★★☆
depends only on print height
depends only on print height
depends on layer cross section &
print height
Hardware Maintainability★★★☆☆★★★★☆★★★☆☆
Original Online Resources★☆☆☆☆★★★★★★★★★★
Community Resources★★★★☆★★★★☆★★★☆☆
After Sales Support★★☆☆☆★★★★☆★★★★☆
Third Party Market★★★☆☆★★☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆
  1. based on overall build and firmware, which can’t even properly calculate remaining print time while printing, I have a low expectation
  2. value for all is the same, because the low price for Anycubic Photon Mono series also give you moderately good solution, whereas Formlabs printers are very pricey but also giving you good value, and Prusa SL1S rather high priced for the gaining reliability and print speed
  3. Form Wash station for Form 3, Form Wash L for Form 3L, you move the build plate direct into the washing station, and before curing remove them from the build plate
  4. Prusa SL1S prints a layer in 2 seconds in total, whereas traditional MSLA takes 7-10s (exposure time + lifting/retraction)

That’s it.


MSLA Anycubic Photon Mono 4K


  • 2023/07/25: moved content from blog into regular pages
  • 2023/03/15: adding more Settings for different resins, different default for different firmware version, added preliminary Review
  • 2023/03/09: finally published
  • 2023/03/05: first prints made, more info on Lychee Slicer, Prusa Slicer SLA, more on magnetic steel plate use, prints with or without support, closeup photos added
  • 2022/11/29: added Drip Hook, still preparing the utilities to make first print
  • 2022/11/26: Mono 4K arrived, preparing software pipeline (slicer, converters) and working place
  • 2022/11/07: starting write-up


The past years I focused on Filament Deposition Manufacturing (FDM) / extrusion based 3D printing, and the time came to focus on MSLA resin based process as well.

My main use case a small pieces, like custom pulleys and idlers – precise parts, such as:

Anycubic Photon Mono 4K

The Anycubic Photon Mono 4K seemed like a good choice to start with:

  • build volume: 132 x 80 x 165 mm (WxDxH)
  • resolution: XY 35μm, Z 50μm
  • 6.1″ display with 4K resolution (3840×2400) display
  • monochromatic LCD (hence “Mono”), faster printer due shorter exposure
  • affordable with EUR 170-220 (2022/11)
  • no network, only USB drive printing
Stereolithography Apparatus
– one beam/point light source
Mask Stereolithography Apparatus
– one light source, masking what does not need to be printed
Digital Light Processing
– one image, each pixel controlled by micro mirror

I ordered 2022/11/22 for EUR 170 and received it 4 days later via Anycubic Store within Amazon, along with a few utilities like water wash resins, gloves, etc – ready to MSLA print.

Update 2023/05: the Mono 4K has been discontinued, and replaced with Mono 2 with slightly larger print volume of 143 (+11mm) x 89 (+9mm) x 165 (+33mm).

FDM/FFF vs Resin

X, Y precision: 100μm
Z precision: 50μm
minimal structure: 200-600μm1)
minimal post-processing
minimal toxicity of filament
print duration based on printed volume
large scale prints affordable
1kg filament EUR 15-30
mixed materials2)
X, Y precision: 35-75μm
Z precision
: 30-50μm
minimal structure
: 30-50μm
extensive post-processing
severe toxicity of resin
print duration based on print Z height only
large scale prints require expensive printers
1kg resin EUR 30-803)
single material
  1. depends on nozzle diameter
  2. multiple printheads/hotends required, e.g. IDEX, tool changer, material changer
  3. Anycubic sold water wash resins at 22-27 EUR/kg 2023/03 (black, white, clear, grey and waterblue)

Print Settings

  • layer height: 0.05mm / 50μm
  • exposure time: 2s
  • light-off time: 0.5s
  • bottom layer count: 6
  • bottom exposure time: 40s
  • lifting distance: 6mm
  • lifting speed: 4mm/s
  • retract speed: 6mm/s
  • anti-aliasing level: 1
  • file formats: pwma (proprietary)

Photon Workshop on Linux

My development environment is Linux, and as of 2022/11 there is no Linux Photon Workshop, the name of the slicer needed to slice for Mono 4K; but you can run it via Wine (a Windows compatibility wrapper):

% wine AnycubicPhotonWorkshop_V2.2.19_x86.exe

and afterwards it is available direct at:

% wine ~/.wine/drive_c/Program\ Files\ \(x86\)/AnycubicPhotonWorkshop/AnycubicPhotonWorkshop.exe

I tried my xyzHollowCalibrationCubeV2 and used auto hollow feature which defaults to 2mm thickness:

This seems to work but is not ideal. The Photon Workshop reveals that Photon Mono 4K supports only .pmwa format, which as it turns out, is PWS format just with the extension .pmwa to avoid mixing up different PWS files for different machines, as the pixel-based slices are hardware dependent now as resolution of the display is set.

Chitubox for Linux

Chitubox Slicer is available for Linux natively and supports a variety of SLA printers, also the Mono 4K:

I also used the auto hollow feature, which defaulted to 1.2mm wall thickness.

Lychee Slicer for Linux

I ended up with the Lychee Slicer which is available for Linux as well, which contains some annoying advertising to wait for when slicing or exporting various formats, but functionality-wise it it is more intuitive than Chitubox Slicer.

Prusa SLA Slicer

As mentioned, the Photon Mono 4K has its own proprietary file-format PWS file to print with, with a particular file extension to indicate which Anycubic MSLA device it is sliced for:

MachineFile ExtensionLayer Image Encoding

Prusa Slicer slices also for MSLA, it’s own .sl1 format, just a ZIP file with a list of PNG files per slice, in order to convert .sl1 to PWS/.pwma another tool is required:

  • UVtools, it can read and write many SLA image formats, incl. PhotonWorkshop (.pw*) file-formats
  • another approach could be (as of 2022/12 not yet) to just convert sl1 to .photon with SL1toPhoton command line tool, and extend functionality to support PWS/.pwma as well
  • alternatively uv3dp supports pw0 and pws files, but struggles with new(er) PWS files like .pwma

.photon/ctb/cbddlp vs .pw*

.photon (and ctb/cbddlp) is an older file format, whereas newer Photon Workshop (PW) has PWS and PW0 encoded images as layers – so far the format seems reverse engineered and somewhat documented via UVTools: PhotonWorkshopFormat.cs

ManufacturerFile ExtensionFIle FOrmat
Anycubic Photon*PWS/PW0
Anycubic Photon.photonalike CTB
Elegoo Mars.ctbCTB/CBDDLP1)
Creality LD002.ctbCTB/CBDLP1)
  1. possibly encrypted, but the algorithm is available

PWS vs SL1

Some deeper dive into the available metadata of PWS vs SL1 format:

PWS (header)SL1 (prusaslicer.ini)
“xy_pixel”: 35.0,
“z_thickness”: 0.05000000074505806,
“exposure_time”: 2.0,
“off_time”: 0.5,
“bottom_layers_exposure_time”: 40.0,
“bottom_layers”: 6.0,
“z_lift_height”: 6.0,
“z_lift_speed”: 4.0,
“z_drop_speed”: 6.0,
“total_volume”: 4.853200912475586,
“antialiasing_grade”: 1,
“x_resolution”: 3840,
“y_resolution”: 2400,
“weight”: 0.0,
“price”: 1.067704200744629,
“resin_type”: 36,
“layers_count”: 400

“absolute_correction”: “0”,
“area_fill”: “50”,
“bed_shape”: “0x0,120×0,120×68,0x68”,
“bottle_cost”: “0”,
“bottle_volume”: “1000”,
“bottle_weight”: “1”,
“display_height”: “68”,
“display_mirror_x”: “1”,
“display_mirror_y”: “0”,
“display_orientation”: “portrait”,
“display_pixels_x”: “2560”,
“display_pixels_y”: “1440”,
“display_width”: “120”,
“elefant_foot_compensation”: “0”,
“elefant_foot_min_width”: “0.2”,
“exposure_time”: “10”,
“faded_layers”: “10”,

“fast_tilt_time”: “5”,
“gamma_correction”: “1”,
“hollowing_closing_distance”: “2”,
“hollowing_enable”: “0”,
“hollowing_min_thickness”: “3”,
“hollowing_quality”: “0.5”,
“initial_exposure_time”: “15”,
“initial_layer_height”: “0.3”,
“layer_height”: “0.3”,

“material_correction”: “1,1,1”,
“material_correction_x”: “1”,
“material_correction_y”: “1”,
“material_correction_z”: “1”,
“material_density”: “1”,
“material_print_speed”: “fast”,
“max_exposure_time”: “100”,
“max_initial_exposure_time”: “150”,
“max_print_height”: “200”,
“min_exposure_time”: “0”,
“min_initial_exposure_time”: “0”,
“output_filename_format”: “[input_filename_base].sl1”,
“pad_around_object”: “0”,
“pad_around_object_everywhere”: “0”,
“pad_brim_size”: “1.6”,
“pad_enable”: “1”,
“pad_max_merge_distance”: “50”,
“pad_object_connector_penetration”: “0.3”,
“pad_object_connector_stride”: “10”,
“pad_object_connector_width”: “0.5”,
“pad_object_gap”: “1”,
“pad_wall_height”: “0”,
“pad_wall_slope”: “90”,
“pad_wall_thickness”: “2”,
“printer_technology”: “SLA”,
“relative_correction”: “1,1”,
“relative_correction_x”: “1”,
“relative_correction_y”: “1”,
“relative_correction_z”: “1”,
“slice_closing_radius”: “0.049”,
“slicing_mode”: “regular”,
“slow_tilt_time”: “8”,
“support_base_diameter”: “4”,
“support_base_height”: “1”,
“support_base_safety_distance”: “1”,
“support_buildplate_only”: “0”,
“support_critical_angle”: “45”,
“support_head_front_diameter”: “0.4”,
“support_head_penetration”: “0.2”,
“support_head_width”: “1”,
“support_max_bridge_length”: “15”,
“support_max_bridges_on_pillar”: “3”,
“support_max_pillar_link_distance”: “10”,
“support_object_elevation”: “5”,
“support_pillar_connection_mode”: “dynamic”,
“support_pillar_diameter”: “1”,
“support_pillar_widening_factor”: “0”,
“support_points_density_relative”: “100”,
“support_points_minimal_distance”: “1”,
“support_small_pillar_diameter_percent”: “50%”,
“supports_enable”: “1”


  • PWS:
    • xy_pixel dictates square pixels
    • x_resolution & y_resolution with xy_pixel give actual build area
    • build height (Z) determined via layers_count * z_thickness, assuming equal layer heights
  • SL1:
    • does not report layer counts, but be determined from the amount of enclosed .png files
      • does not support multi-exposure printing
x_resolution [px]display_pixels_x [px]
y_resolution [px]display_pixels_y [px]
xy_pixel [μm]display_pixels_x / bedshape[x] * 1000 [μm]

Replacing Firmware

MSLA resin printers are quite closed systems without much information of the hardware, firmware, and additional having their own proprietary file formats which contain the layer images.

For the Anycubic Photon Mono 4K is an open source firmware available, Turbo Resin – which gave me a good reason to get this 3D printer (2023/07: the firmware isn’t complete yet). Along with it, the hardware has been pretty much reversed engineered.

Anycubic FirmwareTurbo Resin (2022/12)
– PW0/PWMA format– PW0/PWMA & CTB format

Custom MSLA Slicer

Pondering on a custom MSLA slicer:

  • automatic hollowing of solids at certain wall thickness
  • automatic support generation, outside and inside (after hollowing)
  • drain hole generation
  • command line interface (CLI)
  • external preview of sliced part
  • supporting sl1 and pws/pw0 as a start
FeaturePrusa SlicerLychee SlicerChituBox Slicer
command line interface (CLI)Y
automatic hollowingYYY
drain holesYYY
automatic supportYYY
Linux supportY
PWS supportYY

Open MSLA Format

Unfortunately there is no open (M)SLA format, each manufacturer kind of does its own, whereas G-code .gcode has some conformity, although G-code in general is also machine specific has it has absolute positioning, which differ from machine to machine, but at least G-code is easy to compose unlike proprietary (M)SLA file formats.

SL1 format by Prusa Engineering is a simple ZIP file which contains:

  • config.ini: irrelevant info
  • prusaslicer.ini: info about printer (bed size), pixel density, and many slicer settings
  • *.png: enumerated image files per slice in PNG format

and thereby is open enough for my taste.

Requirements of Open MSLA Format

  • simple format for controller to decode
    • simple pixel data1)
    • simple preview image format1)
  1. this is why PWS/PW0 or CTB fileformat use some simple RLE algorithm to compress pixel data

First Print

After many weeks postponing, as I wasn’t eager deal with the inherent messiness of resin printing, I gave it a shot with some of the Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces (TPMS) (2023/03/05):

The Lychee Slicer gave 1h 15m print time, the printer itself showed 2h 15m; I used Anycubic White Water Wash Resin. I used automatic supports, and it printed 5 pieces successful, 3 pieces failed and only apprx. 4mm Z height were printed, interestingly all 3 failed pieces failed at the same Z height and broke off and stuck at the print plate.

I reprinted the 3 failed pieces at the same place, and this time they succeeded – which is strange as I suspected perhaps uneven light or some other positional inconsistency, but obviously the position did not matter, which is bad as I don’t know what caused the first failed print.

The curved bottoms (not directly printed but with diverse support pipes) already showing severe distortion while printing.

Update: It seems my office rooms aren’t warm enough, so the bed adhesion isn’t optimal as I read up in some forum posts. I tried to print a few other pieces, all failed the next day in the room with 15-19C° – the prints detached after 2-3mm height from the build plate. I moved it to another warmer room, warmed the resin on the radiator which helped.

The overall quality of the pieces is astonishing, no visible voxels or layers are seen, incredible quality for those prints which didn’t fail.

Yet the failure rate is still significant for my taste, so I need to pay close attention to room temperature, and other aspects:

The cause of the “delimination” isn’t clear yet to me, it seems the prints with proper support and elevated bottom printed better, but I need to confirm with more prints.

More photos you find at MSLA printing Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces (TPMS).

Curing Station

As a start I assembled a simple DIY curing station with a 5m UV LED strip and placed it inside a plastic cup, with some aluminium foil at the bottom and top lid:

I only cure for 4-5mins, longer exposure changes the white resin into yellowish tint, and indicates over curing.

Keeping Resin in the Vat

After a print, the resins needs to be filtered for impurities, such as partial cured pieces not attached to the part, with a funnel and filter into a cup or bottle, and then it can be poured back into the vat ready to print again.

One can leave the resin in the vat for weeks, if you stir the resin short before you print again – stirring the resin within the vat is not ideal, as one has to avoid to scratch or FEP film; yet there is no need to pour resin back into the bottle unless one changes the resin, like the brand or color.

Drip Hook

I remixed an existing drip hook for Photon Mono to fit Photon Mono 4K, and make it easier to slide the bed on and off.


Spring Steel Build Plate

Additionally I’ve got a spring steel build plate 135x80mm with a magnetic base for EUR 10 (2022/12).

This turned out to be a good choice, the removal of the pieces is easy without additional tool.


  • the thickness of the adhesive magnet holding the plate required the optical Z endswitch to recalibrate, instead to move the sensor, I extended the light breaking piece with just a small piece of paper with a drop of glue – it was easier than 3d printing an extender for the entire sensor.
  • in my case the small handle of the plate scratches on the original vat at the last 3-4mm height, therefore the entire plate needs to be slightly misaligned (just pushing one side while fastening the build plate) so the handle doesn’t touch the vat.
    • third party Anycubic Mono 4K vat like from Mega/Kingroon have a larger space, and don’t need any fiddling around therefore
  • the spring steel is sharp, it happened several times the single-use gloves being torn/cut while handling the plate

(One of) My Use Case

After a few days I aimed for the main use case of mine: printing custom pulleys.

MSLA @ 35μm XY, 50μm Z vs FFF @ 400μm nozzle, 100μm Z

As I printed them with Anycubic Water Wash White Resin without support, the “elephant foot” comes from the first 6 layers being cured for 40s as in my case, and the UV light refracting and curing more than meant to be, but I can neglect this.

16 custom pulleys ID8 20T printed with Anycubic Photon Mono 4K in 1h 30m or 5m30s per piece

geometrical accuracy★★★★☆1)★★★☆☆
surface quality★★★★☆★★☆☆☆
mechanical sturdiness(not yet tested)★★★☆☆ (PLA)
print time per piece5m 30s2)15m
print time for 1 piece1h 30m15m
print time for 16 pieces1h 30m4h
  1. due the “elephant foot” the Z accuracy was off by 0.8mm, instead of 15.0mm it’s 14.2mm
  2. when printing 16 pieces, it took 1h 30m for printing 15mm in Z, I could have printed ~28 pulleys on 132 x 80mm build plate, bringing print time for a piece down to 3m 10s


from Anycubic Web-Site (2023/03/12)

My own experience with different resins (to be extended):

Defaults V0.0.11
Firmware V0.11
Defaults V2.0.2
Firmware V0.16
White WATER WASH RESIN (Anycubic)Clear Water Wash Resin (Resione)
Layer Thickness [μm]50505050
Exposure Time [s]32.532 .. 3
Exposure Off Time [s]2.510.50.5
Bottom Exposure [s]50304040
Bottom Layers6666
Z Lift Distance [mm]
Z Lift Speed [mm/s]
Z Retract Speed [mm/s]
UV Power [%]10010010050 .. 100
NotesDistance, Speed & Retract Speed for
– [BL] Bottom Layers
– [NL] Normal Layers
individually definable
– geometrical precise– soft with 3s exposure
– stiffer & brittle with 5s exposure
– geometrical not precise (+0.2 .. 0.8mm in XYZ)

Preliminary Review


  • good prints for the price
  • cost effective
  • power loss recovery actually works
  • lot’s of third party replacements (vat, FEP, etc)1)
  • alternatively Open Source firmware
  • nearly full reverse engineered hardware
  1. this actually is quite important: popular machine raise a secondary market for replacements: future replacement of parts even when Anycubic ends support


  • newly bought machine had outdated firmware
  • updated firmware calculates wrong total print time, this is just sloppy
  • touchscreen unreliable (wrong position) ‘print’ vs ‘delete’, use a soft pencil
  • slow prints with default settings (1mm/s Z motion), not nearly at 50mm/h height as advertised


  • slicer print settings are ignored, only settings on the machine matter
    • advantage: once sliced the .pwma can be printed with different resins and settings changed on the machine only
    • disadvantage: one has to memorize or document settings for different resins, as it not stored in the .pwma file


It’s a low-cost entry level MSLA machine, Anycubic seems to care little about the software (2023/03) as the slicer as well the firmware are Minimal Viable Product (MVP) level, but aren’t mature or reliable at all. Given they sell 500K+ machines per year at least, investing to improve in the firmware would help 500,000 users.

Small anecdote: I bought a pre-owned Mono 4K, becoming “Photon 2”, from official Anycubic store at Ebay directly – the listing said the machine likely would miss some parts – but I felt to get some more in-depth experience, and I’ve got what I asked for: the machine came dirty with resin all over, no power-supply, no build-plate, no vat, and cured resin between LCD and underlying (acryl-)glass, spent EUR 120+ for replacement parts, and 10+ hrs cleaning it to get it in working condition again. From a cost saving point of view not worth it, but experience wise it was good to get to know the machine more thoroughly.


Anycubic Photon Mono 4K specific:

General Photon Series MSLA:

MSLA Slicers:


3D Printing: MSLA printing Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces (TPMS) – Gallery


  • 2023/07/25: adding 20mm/40mm TPMS photos
  • 2023/03/12: starting write-up, and published

20mm cubes of several Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces (TPMS) as explored at Generative Parametric Infill Geometries printed with MSLA (Anycubic Photon Mono 4K) at 35 μm XY, 50 μm Z:

Most of the cubes were printed without support, the cylindrical and spherical projections required supports.


20mm and 40mm cubes of TPMS mounted on canvases:


3D Printing: Parametric Generative 3D Infill Geometries


  • 2023/02/09: finally published
  • 2023/02/08: worked on text and illustrations a lot, many sample prints, multiple visualization approaches, details on f1 + f2 vs f1 * f2 and cylindrical and spherical transformation of TMPS
  • 2023/01/05: adding mesh/voxel renderings, slicing geometry to generate G-code
  • 2022/12/11: first FDM G-code generated using 2D / contour approach
  • 2022/12/07: included many suitable periodic minimal surfaces
  • 2022/12/02: start with implicit surface focus

As I progress I will update this blog-post.


Infill geometries are geometries which are continuous, repetitive or periodic; they fill a boundary defined geometry aka outer form often defined via meshs. Let’s dive into some of the simple geometries and then looking at some more complex structures:

The Implicit Geometries

Implicit geometries are geometries defined via f(x,y,z) = 0 defining their surface, the boundary between inside and outside and they are ideal to define repetitive or periodic 3D infill geometries.


Sphere: x2 + y2 + z2 – r2 = 0

When you ever tried to compose a sphere as a mesh, you know there are many ways to do so, and all are more complex than this simple description, and as you realize, the formula is perfect, it’s not an approximation – this is the nature of implicit formula. When you try to visualize an implicit formula, then you need to discretize and there the approximation takes place, as a mesh or as voxels.

Another nifty property of the sphere, it is the minimal surface to circumvent a volume, and through this blog-post, the minimal surface will become a common theme.


Cube: max(abs(x),abs(y),abs(z)) – w/2 = 0


Plane: z = 0

As I render only -10 to 10 to each axis, it creates a small plate:

Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS)

Let’s move to the world of minimal surfaces, so called Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces (TPMS), those can be expressed in implicit form and have some properties as sought for infill geometries.

In differential geometry, a triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) is a minimal surface in ℝ3 that is invariant under a rank-3 lattice of translations. These surfaces have the symmetries of a crystallographic group. Numerous examples are known with cubic, tetragonal, rhombohedral, and orthorhombic symmetries. Monoclinic and triclinic examples are certain to exist, but have proven hard to parametrise.

Wikipedia: Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS), retrieved 2023/02/08

Schwarz P aka Primitive

One of the simplest yet powerful formula:

Schwarz P: cos(x) + cos(y) + cos(z) = 0

increasing the frequency or scale of the structure:

By extending the formula with +a, we can animate it:

animating a: -1..1, transits from octahedron to cuboctahedron
Schwarz P 4x animated a: -1..1

Schwarz D aka Diamond

Schwarz D: sin(x)*sin(y)*sin(z) + sin(x)*cos(y)*cos(z) +
cos(x)*sin(y)*cos(z) + cos(x)*cos(y)*sin(z) = 0


Neovius: 3*(cos(x)+cos(y)+cos(z)) + 4*cos(x)*cos(y)*cos(z) = 0

C(Y) Surface

C(Y) Surface: sin(x)*sin(y)*sin(z) + sin(2x)*sin(y) + cos(x)*sin(2y) + sin(2y)*sin(z) + sin(2z)*sin(x) + cos(x)*cos(y)*cos(z) + sin(2x)*cos(z) + cos(x)*sin(2y) + cos(y)*sin(2z) = 0

Fischer Koch

Fischer Koch: (cos(x)*cos(y)*cos(z) + cos(z)*cos(x)) –
(cos(2x)+cos(2y)+cos(2z)) = 0

S Surface

S Surface: cos(2x)*sin(y)*cos(z) + cos(2y)*sin(z)*cos(x) +
cos(2z)*sin(y)*cos(y) – 0.4 = 0


Gyroid: cos(x)*sin(y) + cos(y)*sin(z) + cos(z)*sin(x) = 0


FRD: 8 * a*cos(x)*cos(y)*cos(z) + b*(cos(2x)*cos(2y)*cos(2z)) –
c*cos(2x)*cos(2y) – d*cos(2y)*cos(2z) – e*cos(2z)*cos(2x)

Let’s explore this form more thoroughly, we animate a, b, c, d, and e and see what it does, essentially we animate -1 to 1 in sinus, 0 eliminates of the chunk of the formula:

animating a (-1..-1)
animating b (-1..1)
animating c (-1..1)
animating d (-1..1)
animating e (-1..1)

Gyroid Skeletal

Gyroid Skeletal: 10*cos(x)*sin(y)+cos(y)*sin(z)+cos(z)*sin(x)) –
0.5*(cos(2x)*cos(2y)+cos(2y)*cos(2z)+cos(2z)*cos(2x)) – 14

P Skeletal

P Skeletal: 10*(cos(x)+cos(y)+cos(z) –
5.1*(cos(x)*cos(y)+cos(y)*cos(z)+cos(z)*cos(x)) – 14.6

By changing the last substraction of 14.6 to 10 or 8, the structure get more dense – ideal to use.

P Skeletal, animating main subtraction -14.6(thin)..5.4(disconnected)

The P Skeletal connects 6 arms to each other.

IWP Skeletal

IWP Skeletal connects 8 arms to each other.

Schwarz D Skeletal

Schwarz D Skeletal connects with 4 arms to each other.

The above “skeletal” minimal surfaces are ideal for lattice structures, likely most usable in context of voxel-based 3D printing approaches, such as SLA, SLS, SLM and so forth, but less ideal for traditional FDM where the lattice is sliced Z-planar again kind of defeating the overall purpose of lattice structures.

D Surface

D Surface: cos(x)*cos(y)*cos(z) – sin(x)*sin(y)*sin(z)

As Juergen Meier created a variant, adding a, which gives these variants:

providing a structure using 4 arms to connect each other.


Using Implicit Geometries as Infill Structures

Slic3r and Prusa Slicer are providing gyroid infill pattern since early version, but beyond that it seems no to little development happened since (2022/12).

Let’s see how implicit geometry can be transformed into slices (FDM) or voxels/pixels (SLA, SLS etc)

Algorithm A: 3D Cache

  • create point cloud of surface of implicit geometry
  • create surface of implicit geometry using marching cube
  • (optional) determine x, y, z size where it repeats itself
  • slice surface for infills at certain scale
    • clip inner surface with outer perimeter of slice


  • with caching: fast lookup of infill geometry


  • many steps
  • x, y, z repeatability must be given, hard to determine programmatically from outside
  • clipping to perimeter can be computational expensive depending

Algorithm B: 2D Cache

  • create 2D point cloud of a slice of implicit geometry based on clipped 2D area / slice
  • convert 2D point cloud to polylines (FDM) or pixels (SLA)


  • reduction to 2D problem at first stage
  • fast 2D point cloud creation as only one z-level is used


  • create 2D point cloud at arbitrary resolution, loss of curves unless refitted
  • caching without knowing repeatability of the geometry makes little sense

FDM G-code

Here some early G-code for FDM 3D printer using PyImplicit tool tracking the implicit surface as 2D contour:

Meshs & Voxels

The implicit surfaces only define the surface, either:

  • inside vs outside – a solid; or
  • certain thickness of such surface

In order to create watertight meshs the volume needs to be limited with a boundary box, and Marching Cube is performed from outside to get proper mesh to post-process afterwards.

Now you may wonder, what’s the fuss with all those forms, why doing this complicate implicit form, why not just create a few forms as meshs right away and repeat them orderly – well, here it comes why:

Frequency or Scale Gradients

Changing the frequency or scale s0 and s1 can be achieved by:

znorm = (z-zmin) / (zmax-zmin)
s = (1-znorm)*s0 + znorm*s1 or
s = lerp(s0, s1, znorm)
f = surface(x*s, y*s, z*s)

This shows the power of generative geometries, we simply can define the scale or frequency of a geometry at any point, given we transit within reason and not too sharply to cause discontinuty.

Thickness Gardients

Alike changing thickness:

znorm = (z-zmin) / (zmax-zmin)
t = lerp(t0, t1, znorm)
f = abs(surface(x,y,z)) – t

Form Gradients

What looks very complex is done quite simply with:

znorm = (z-zmin) / (zmax-zmin)
f = lerp(surface1(x,y,z) , surface2(x,y,z), znorm)

This is quite powerful property, to be able to morph from one implicit form to another with such a simple formula.

Contineous Transitions:

  • Schwarz D – Schwarz P
  • Schwarz D – Neovius
  • Schwarz P – Neovius
  • thickness: IWP Skeletal – Schwarz P
  • thickness: IWP Skeletal – Schwarz D

Discontinueous Transitions:

  • IWP Skeletal – P Skeletal
  • IWP Skeletal – Neovius
  • solid: IWP Skeletal – Schwarz P
  • solid: IWP Skeletal – Schwarz D

Combining Implicit Surfaces


Algebraic addition has the effect of apply one geometry within another, alike recursion:


Algebraic multiplication has the effect of clipping, or geometrical intersection:

Mapping Implicit Surfaces

One can map the coordinates, and create a cylindrical gyroid, where former X & Y become distance and rotation angle, and Z remains as is, and so spherical projection is possible as well, or even feed coordinates through implicit formula itself:

Next blog-post(s) I will go into further details utilizing TPMS in Additive Manufacturing (AM) like FDM/FFF, SLA, MSLA, SLS, MJF or SLM – each one of them have unique features and limitation for using those Parametric Generative Infill Geometries.

Appendix: Visualization

In case you wondered of the different styled visualization through this blog-post, let me show you the different approaches to discretize implicit defined surfaces.


The code is rather simple with OpenSCAD yet rather slow: either skin is true or false, and delta determines the thickness of the skin if enable:

t = 1;
r = 20*t;
st = 1/2;
delta = 0.2;

function schwarz_p(x,y,z,s=1) = cos(x*s) + cos(y*s) + cos(z*s);

skin = true;

      for(z=[-r:st:r]) {
         f = schwarz_p(x,y,z,360/20/2);
         if(skin && abs(f)<delta)           // -- skin only
            translate([x,y,z]) cube(st);
         else if(!skin && f<delta)          // -- inside/outside
            translate([x,y,z]) cube(st);

Rendered via voxelation:


Rendered in OpenSCAD via marching cube algorithm with Level Surfaces:

Volumes & Surfaces in OpenGL GLSL

Following experiments were done with Spirula/Implicit3 within the browser, the implicit formulas are rendered in realtime at 100-500 fps using OpenGL’s GLSL (GL Shader Language):

One has to clip the formulas with a cube in order to have a limited set, otherwise you get a full screen looking at infinite X, Y & Z, here Schwarz P:

Spirula/Implict3 realtime rendered Schwarz P TPMS in the browser

Meshs with Marching Cube

In order to create a mesh, I developed PyImplicit which utilizes Numpy library to calculate the implicit formula fast, and then run a Marching Cube algorithm over the result in order to get a discrete mesh like STL, OBJ, or 3MF to process further for 3D printing.

Foreground: 1st row: 90mm cube clipped of frequency gradients on Schwarz D, Schwarz P*,
surface gradient between Schwarz D to Schwarz P (top) at certain thickness or solid,
2nd row: 2x IWP skeletal 90mm cubes at different frequency;
Background: various 30/40mm cube clipped Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces

*) some of my larger prints I attach RFID tags, e.g. as on top of the variable frequency Schwarz P print, which I store the print UID from my Prynt3r job which logs all my prints with all settings and webcam snapshots. In future blog-post I will illustrate my NFC/RFID setup.

And Polyviuw is a small mesh viewer using Polyscope Python as backend to display it as mesh:

It is easy to create huge files when exporting an implicit generative infill geometry and one ends up with a 700MB binary STL file, which becomes hard to view at least on my system. To handle complex outer forms, with complex inner geometries I estimate reaching multiple gigabytes large files – let’s see.




  • 2023/01/22: published, adding machine_uuid details
  • 2023/01/09: keeping in sync with actual development
  • 2022/12/28: starting writeup


Prynt3r (prynt3r) is the Python reimplementation (2022) of my own Print3r (print3r) which was written in Perl back in ~2017.


  • print, slice or preview 3D print jobs (gcode, stl, obj, 3mf, svg, scad, etc)
  • pure command-line interface (CLI)
  • multiple slicers are supported (slic3r, prusa, cura, kirimoto, mandoline, etc), yet, with common slicer agnostic settings
  • multiple printer profiles
  • remote/network printing built-in (tcp, rrf)
  • all prints are logged with all settings incl. unique identifier per print job1)
  1. ability to uniquely identify parts by attaching QR codes of RFID stickers with print UID to tie physical part with print job


After download and installation, you can start to configure and use it:


          ____    .              __ _____         .
     *   / __ \_______* ______  / /|__  /_____                 *
        / /_/ / ___/ / / / __ \/ __//_ </ ___/  .         |             *
   .   / ____/ /  / /_/ / / / / /____/ / /              -=*=-      .
      /_/   /_/   \__, /_/ /_/\__/____/_/        *   .    |
                 /____/                     V0.0.8           *          .

Prynt3r 0.0.8 USAGE: [<opts>] <cmd> <arg1> ...

      slice <file1> ...    slice file(s) into single gcode, e.g. use -o <fn> or --output=<fn>
      print <file1> ...    slice and send gcode to printer local or remote, e.g. define -d <dev> or --device=<dev>
      preview <file1> ...  slice file(s) into single gcode and launch gcode viewer
      gconsole             starts interactive g-code console
      log [<s>] [#<n>]     list log, query term <s> or list log entry '#<n>', with --output or -o you can list only particul
      client               start client process, so remote prynt3r can access it

      stl, obj, off, 3mf, ply, scad, jscad, zcad, vdb, svg

      --help               print this message
      --version            print version and exit

      --device=<dev>       set device (default: /dev/ttyUSB0)
        -d <dev>

      --printer=<name>     set printer name (default: default)
        -p <name>

      --slicer=<slicer>    set slicer: cura, cura-legacy, cura4, cura5, curax, prusa, slic3r, slic3r-pe, slicer4rtn, cura-slicer, super, mandoline, 5dmaker, kirimoto, zplus, lab, vox3l, voxgl, metatron, enoch, goslice, (default: slic3r)
        -s <slicer>

      --gcode-viewer=<cmd> set gcode previewer (default: yagv)

      --verbose=<n>        increase verbosity
      --extended or -x     extended output, e.g. for 'log' command
      --quiet or -q        stay quiet, only output warnings or errors

      --output=<fn>        slice: slicing into a particular file 'prynt3r slice cube.stl -o test.gcode' or
         -o <fn>              log: 'prynt3r log -o uid,files,args' to list particular fields of the log file

      --placement=<loc>    set location: 'none', 'center', 'random' (default: none)

      --rotate=<x>,<y>,<z> rotate model(s)
      --scale=<f>          scale model(s) uniformly
      --scale=<x>,<y>,<z>  scale model(s), if value has 'mm' appended, then axis is set absolute
                              e.g. "0,0,20mm" scales model(s) to 20mm Z height, all axes with 0 scales

      --multiply-part=<n>  multiply model(s)

      --recenter=<s>       recenter models (default: 1), recommended when rotating
      --relevel=<s>        relevel models (default: 1), recommended when rotating

      --uid=<uid>          set uid for print process (otherwise unique will be generated)
      --keep               keep all temporary files (for debugging)

      --scad               treat arguments as OpenSCAD code, e.g. --scad 'cube(20)'
         --scadlib=<lib>[,<lib2>]   consider libraries as well, e.g. --scadlib=parts.scad
      --zcad               treat arguments as OpenZCAD code
      --jscad              treat arguments as OpenJSCAD code

  slicing options (slicer independent):
      --machine-name=<v>         set machine name (default: "Unknown")
      --machine-uuid=<v>         set machine uuid (default: "")
      --machine-width=<v>        set machine width (default: 200.0)
      --machine-depth=<v>        set machine depth (default: 200.0)
      --machine-height=<v>       set machine height (default: 180.0)
      --nozzle-diameter=<v>      set nozzle diameter (default: "0.4")
      --line-width=<v>           set line width (default: 0.4)
      --layer-height=<v>         set layer height (default: "0.3")
      --filament-diameter=<v>    set filament diameter (default: "1.75")
      --fill-density=<v>         set fill density (default: "20")
      --temperature=<v>          set temperature (default: "200")
      --first-layer-temperature=<v> set first layer temperature (default: "210")
      --bed-temperature=<v>      set bed temperature (default: "45")
      --first-layer-height=<v>   set first layer height (default: "0.25")
      --first-layer-speed=<v>    set first layer speed (default: "20")
      --skirts=<v>               set skirts (default: "2")
      --brims=<v>                set brims (default: "0")
      --rafts=<v>                set rafts (default: "0")
      --support=<v>              set support (default: "none")
      --support-angle=<v>        set support angle (default: "60")
      --seam=<v>                 set seam (default: "aligned")
      --top-thickness=<v>        set top thickness (default: "0")
      --bottom-thickness=<v>     set bottom thickness (default: "0")
      --wall-thickness=<v>       set wall thickness (default: "0")
      --perimeters=<v>           set perimeters (default: "2")
      --top-layers=<v>           set top layers (default: "2")
      --bottom-layers=<v>        set bottom layers (default: "2")
      --start-gcode=<v>          set start gcode (default: "G28 X0 Y0\\nG1 X100 F6000\\nG28 Z0\\nM206 X0 Y-25 Z0.15\\n\n")
      --end-gcode=<v>            set end gcode (default: "G1 Y290 F6000\\nM104 S0\\nM140 S0\\nM84\\n")
      --abort-gcode=<v>          set abort gcode (default: "M104 S0 ; extruder heater off\\nM140 S0 ; heated bed heater off (if you have it)\\nG1 X10 F9000 ; go way to the left\\nM84     ; motors off\\n")
      --prepend-gcode=<v>        set prepend gcode (default: "")
      --retraction-length=<v>    set retraction length (default: "2")
      --retraction-speed=<v>     set retraction speed (default: "70")
      --print-speed=<v>          set print speed (default: "60")
      --travel-speed=<v>         set travel speed (default: "130")
      --perimeter-speed=<v>      set perimeter speed (default: "60")
      --small-perimeter-speed=<v> set small perimeter speed (default: "15")
      --infill-speed=<v>         set infill speed (default: "80")
      --bridge-speed=<v>         set bridge speed (default: "60")
      --extruders-count=<v>      set extruders count (default: "1")
      --cool-fan-speed=<v>       set cool fan speed (default: "100")
      --cool-fan-speed-min=<v>   set cool fan speed min (default: "30")
      --cool-fan-speed-max=<v>   set cool fan speed max (default: "100")

      prynt3r print cube.stl
      prynt3r print cube.scad
      prynt3r -p prusa-i3 print --scad 'cube(20)'
      prynt3r -p ashtar-k-1 -s cura5 slice cube.3mf
      prynt3r -p ashtar-k-1 -s cura5 print structure.vdb -d tcp:
      prynt3r -s prusa slice cube.stl -o a.gcode
      prynt3r preview cube.stl
      prynt3r log
      prynt3r log cube.stl -v
      prynt3r log '#100' -xv
      prynt3r log -o uid,args,files
      prynt3r -d /dev/ttyACM0 client &
      prynt3r -d /dev/ttyACM1 gconsole
      > M115


First you need to adjust the profile for your 3D printer(s):

% cd ~/.config/prynt3r/printer
% cp /usr/share/prynt3r/printer/default.ini myprinter.ini

as next edit myprinter.ini according the specifications of your printer, after that your profile is available as -p myprinter or --printer=myprinter when calling prynt3r:

% prynt3r -p myprinter print --scad 'cube(20)' --fill-density=0

Machine UUID

Optionally, if you run a bunch of 3D printers, define machine_uuid in your .ini file, which references the Marlin’s UUID or RepRapFirmware’s Board ID or as fallback the MAC of the Wi-Fi – this is what the machine_uuid is verified with on serial or remote connection.

Retrieve the UUID with

% prynt3r -d /dev/ttyACM0 gconsole

and then send M115 and M122, like:

Marlin M115

% FIRMWARE_NAME:Marlin (Sep 23 2022 16:48:31) PROTOCOL_VERSION:1.0 MACHINE_TYPE:Ashtar K E3 #3 L8 EXTRUDER_COUNT:3 UUID:8309209b-1c20-11ed-861d-0122ac4e0002

RepRapFirmware M122

RepRapFirmware for Duet 3 Mini 5+ version 3.4.0alpha (2021-07-09 08:59:45) running on Duet 3 Mini5plus Ethernet (standalone mode)
Board ID: ABR3A-KA67A-J03J0-40TFS-21D0Z-RTDXU
Used output buffers: 1 of 40 (2 max)
=== RTOS ===
Static ram: 102768
Dynamic ram: 105632 of which 0 recycled
Never used RAM 35304, free system stack 155 words
Tasks: NETWORK(ready,25.8%,546) ETHERNET(notifyWait,0.0%,662) HEAT(notifyWait,0.0%,361) Move(notifyWait,0.1%,302) CanReceiv(notifyWait,0.0%,939) CanSender(notifyWait,0.0%,371) CanClock(delaying,0.0%,340) TMC(notifyWait,1.1%,112) MAIN(running,72.1%,438) IDLE(ready,0.1%,29) AIN(delaying,0.8%,262), total 100.0%
Owned mutexes: USB(MAIN)

without Board ID, checking the WiFi MAC:

- WiFi -
Network state is active
WiFi module is connected to access point
Failed messages: pending 0, notready 0, noresp 0
Bad header: 0/0
WiFi firmware version 1.26-08S32-D
WiFi MAC address ad:15:a3:15:6c:95
WiFi Vcc 0.00, reset reason Power up
WiFi flash size 0, free heap 151828

A printer is identified with:

  • CLI: printer nickname with --printer=<nick> or -p <nick>
  • <nick>.ini: machine_name=“Full Name” where you write it out exactly, e.g. “Ashtar K #3 PAX”, which means it’s Ashtar K number 3 with PAX extension
  • <nick>.ini: machine_uuid=<uid> where you ensure the actual identity with the hardware at time of connecting

Networked Printing

You can print to a computer which has 3D printers connected to, if you run

prynt3r -d /dev/ttyACM0 client &
prynt3r -d /dev/ttyACM1 client &

on the host which has the printer(s) attached, and then on your main computer:

prynt3r -d tcp:host:0 -p myprinter1 print --scad 'cube(20)'
prynt3r -d tcp:host:1 -p myprinter2 print --scad 'cube(20)'

RepRapFirmware Wi-Fi/Ethernet

[Coming Soon] If you run RepRapFirmware like on Duet3D boards, then you can reference them as such:

% prynt3r -d rrf: -p myprinter1 print --scad 'cube(20)'

it will upload the .gcode and run it, yet, prynt3r will wait until the print is finished.

Prynt3r vs Print3r

So far the slicer independent settings of Print3r are the same as for Prynt3r, so you can migrate the ~./config/print3r/printer/* into ~/.config/prynt3r/printer/* simply, the same with the macros.

Migrate from Print3r to Prynt3r

cd ~
mkdir .config/prynt3r
cp -rp .config/print3r/* .config/prynt3r/

The same as print3r:

  • printer profiles
  • slicer profiles incl. mapping
  • macro profiles
  • protocol for remote printing

The differences as print3r:

  • new: better usage output with actual list of slicer independent settings
  • new: written in Python
  • new: smaller code-base (Py ~1.2K lines vs Perl 4.1K lines)
    • one main reason is using trimesh doing import/export/manipulation of meshs incl. diverse mesh formats
  • removed: no gcode rendering into PNG


Misc: Formnext 2022 Review


  • 2022/11/21: published
  • 2022/11/19: starting writeup


Formnext 2022 was a 4 days Additive Manufacturing (AM) event in Frankfurt (Germany) November 15-18 2022, and it had ~750 exhibitors, two huge halls numbered 11 and 12 each with two floors. I attended the 4 days and it was pretty overwhelming. I try to give an overview, for myself to process what I saw, and perhaps for you who couldn’t attend.

E3D Online

E3D is an old timer among 3D printing enthusiasts, so I start with their booth:

I was surprised to get to know E3D manufactures for UltiMaker their CC printcore.


Duet3D is a small UK-based company, but very influential due their excellent and often praised customer support and support forum aside of their slowly expanding board selection:

I met Tony Lock, and we discussed current state of multi-axis support in Duet/RepRapFirmware, and he showed me the Open5X by Freddie Hong printing non-planar as crafted by

I briefly pitched my new tool VirtualGcodeController (vgcodectl) which sits between printing program and the device, and able to change G-code on the fly, transparently bi-directional – as I was told Duet has an alike infrastructure called Duet Software Framework (DSF) which I wasn’t aware of.

Also check this brief interview by Mihai Design:


At german-based Multec booth I saw a multi-printhead setup with a rotating seal to prevent the inactive printheads leak filament – and a precise mechanism to lift the inactive printheads (patented):


Dutch-based company providing infrastructure to mix and extrude your own filament, not just for mixing different colors, but also different materials and achieve custom material properties – the only downside is the price-tag of those desktop filament extruders starting at 10K EUR – which is too high for its functionality for prosumers, and seems to aim for R&D departments of larger companies.

Commercial Slicers

As I have been entering slicing development more seriously, and closely paid attention to possible competitors or collaborators – and interestingly, the majority responded positively when I approached them:


A small danish company, who recently patented interlocking (Z-offsetted layers) printing patterns.

I had a brief chat with Folmer Gringer Brem about industrial slicer capabilities and customer needs, and what I have researched the past year.


A new french company is providing non-planar 5-axis slicer with a nice GUI, and were open enough to give an actual demo and I was impressed by the responsiveness of the GUI but were tight-lipped to reveal anything about the internals – 5-axis slicer with infill patterns:

FreeD Printing

A small 2 person german company, a spin-off from the university Bochum, also coding 5-axis non-planar slicer, showing a small desktop 6-axis robot to print an overhang model, their own logo, and it has infill – which means, they actually did properly slice 5-axis G-code. They were reluctant to go into the details, as their IP represent their core asset as a company:


AiBuild has a huge booth, lots of advertising, has been very secretive last year as they didn’t want to demo their software without NDA to anyone – but while attending Formnext 2022 I was able to get to talk to people who purchased the software, and all of them have been giving me strange feedback: a sort of underwhelming sensation – the software is costly and not deliver what is advertised: you need to know a lot of slicing in order to use the software – there is nothing “Ai” (Artificial Intelligence) as the company name implies, at least not with their slicing software.

On their booth they had the usual non-planar printed pieces, but none of them had infill, so they all are printed in vase-mode or single wall.

One feature I saw though impressed me, it was the live quality control they implemented, having a nozzle camera and machine learning / AI to determine over- and under-extrusion – something which I would say one should have under control, but perhaps it was to illustrate the detection mechanism.


Poland-based 5-axis printer manufacturer has progressed in hardware and software, and developed their own 5-axis slicer – the simulation shown as the actual printer prints – overall well designed.

I had a brief chat with Adam Wajda about the state of their hardware/software stack, very open and friendly exchange.


Hungary-based startup with a dual delta setup printing upside and downside at the same time. They were present last year Formnext 2021 already but with an inactive printer, and this time showing the printer in action:

Beside reducing print-time the printer also is able to print pieces which otherwise are hard or impossible print when layer orientation is given and surface quality is of high priority.


The newly merge Ultimaker + MakerBot = UltiMaker had no booth again, hardly any presence – the marketing / sales department seems in hybernation to skip such as event without their own booth, no hardware innovation on display, perhaps there is nothing (new) to show.

I visited the 3dimensional booth and someone showed me how to print “metal” (just steel as it turned out) with BASF metal filament on a Ultimaker S5, and having everything needed in a nice box and then send off to wash & sinter.


Snapmaker announced a new machine called Snapmaker Artisan: single head operation, yet changeable heads: FDM head, CNC head, laser head – very sturdy desktop machine, using linear motors:


Bleeding edge high temperature resisting materials, and to show the applications they built a most precise FDM printer I have seen so far – Chiara Mascolo briefly showed me the machine and samples:


Massive SLA and SLS machines shown:


The Formlabs booth was well visited, and it was hard to take photos until the last day of the expo – so just a brief video of the Form 3+ printing below:


German-based startup printing with 7 different light curable materials at the same time, drop size / resolution at 60um with the NovoJet C-7 – quite impressive, with the ability to blend drops or let them cure side-by-side giving new possibilities of material gradients in 3D space:

They also provide a station for fluid testing & development, so you can engineer your own material to print with. Even though this was a small both it was for me from a technical point of view most innovative I have seen so far.


As I was looking at resin printheads, I was approaching Global Inkjet Systems (GIS) – a subdivision of Nanodimension:

  • Fabrica 2.0: impressive 2um resolution, but as consequence 1mm height / hr print speed, SLA/DLP
  • Admaflex 300: 35-88um XY resolution, 10-200um layer height, up to 60mm/hr height print speed, resin combined with ceramic/metal printing


A massive industrial resin jetting 3D printer, build-volume at 500 x 250 x 200 mm printing with wax as support material. It is a closed-loop system, it prints, cures and measures the actual layers and adjusts live for the next layer – achieving 100um precision, yet only for industrial application due the cost of 1M USD per machine.

They developed their own packing algorithm in order to achieve high density packing ratio.


Italian-based “Betron Genesi” 4000 x 1900 x 1300mm build volume along with high volume extrusion (~20mm nozzle, layer height ~4-5mm based on my own photos) having excellent extrusion precision, along their real time temperature control:

Additionally is is a hybrid able to run also CNC milling on the same machine for post-processing.

Phaetus & DropEffect

Visited Phaetus expecting to just meet sales people instead I ran into Maximilian Arnold, owner of DropEffect which designs hotends under his own brand but also for chinese-based Phaetus as R&D director. I showed him photos of my early prototype of a Multi-In Mixing Hotend supposed to be printed in Aluminium and he immediately commented on my design and gave me useful input – unexpected interesting and fruitful exchange.

A brief interview with Max conducted by MihaiDesigns:

XAct Metal

This booth impressed by the samples they showed:


France-based company combining FDM and CNC together:

What you achieve with this is incredible precise plastic pieces at 20um precision, while maintaining 500 x 500 x 500mm respectively 1000 x 500 x 500mm build-volume. They are milling with a round drill bit – CNC toolpath is calculated by Autodesk’s Fusion 360 though.


Turkish-based company wire arc welding with 6-axis robot:

Bloom Robotics

Massive ABB 6-axis robot FDM printing on a rotating 2-axis bed . . . with shiny cyan/pink/violet lights, a bit of an overkill with the lights, but the setup was impressive:



It has been overwhelming expo for me, 4 days in noisy halls, constant audible and visual stimuli grown tiresome for me as I was eager to absorb all; I can say I looked at every single booth, and decided within few seconds if something caught my attention, and I knew to lookout for things I did not know or a company I did not recognize – for new companies in the arena of Additive Manufacturing. It took me a single day to roam both floors of a single hall, so at least it takes 2 days to explore two halls of the expo – and if you happen to explore a booth for more than a few mins, you end up with 3-4 days attending easily.

So, the overall impression of mine has been:

  • 3D printing / Additive Manufacturing (AM) specializes into niches more and more
  • resins printed as drops at high resolution & precision
  • paste-like materials get printed in high extrusion quality
  • metal printing showing incredible wide-variety in regards of materials
  • industrial machines are still pricey but seem to me become more affordable, instead of 10M’s they are becoming 100K – 1M while maintaining same functionality
  • multi-axis FDM with robots become more established to print large scale parts
  • in-process/live quality control and logging/documentation for FDM and powder-based processes
  • many startups still coming up with new or refined existing processes
  • gap between prosumer and affordable industrial machines is closing
  • quite open atmosphere, people are willing to share and discuss their technology, collaboration seems more important than eyeing on each as competitors

Some impressions of Frankfurt (Germany) . . .

That’s it.

3D Design: Parametric Mixing FDM Hotend with Metal Printing

Status: early prototype, metal printed model, temperature testing, no extruding yet


  • 2023/01/09: iteration 2 testing results
  • 2022/11/22: early heating tests, no extruding yet
  • 2022/11/21: iteration 1: SLM AlSi10Mg metal printed photos added
  • 2022/11/19: published finally
  • 2022/09/10: adding photos of PLA+ prototype
  • 2022/09/02: starting writeup

This blog-post will be updated as I progress.


I experimented with the Diamond Hotend in the past, but I was limited with the setup given – and adding another color or otherwise change the design seemed impossible, but it has changed now.

Metal 3D printing has been a niche and high priced application the past years, but in 2022 many 3D printing services support:

  • stainless steel: low heat conductivity 15W/mK
  • aluminium: good heat conductivity 210W/mK, yet low melting point 660C°
  • inconel: low heat conductivity 15W/mK
  • titanium: low heat conductivity 17W/mK

at relatively low price and all of the sudden designing a FDM mixing hotend, where multiple filaments are mixed together before exiting the nozzle – like with the Diamond Hotend – can be printed in metal, like with aluminium – so, I started to design a Parametric Mixing Hotend.


  • parametric design with 2 up to 6 filaments inputs
  • combine heatblock, heatbreak and heatsink, make it compact
  • permit ordinary nozzles (MK8/E3D V6), using M7 thread
  • orient heat cartridge vertically (like a E3D Volcano) to support up to 0.8mm nozzles
  • single 30mm fan for heatsink
  • using PC4 M10 or M4 pneumatic couplers as intakes


  • mixing colors: 2 to 6 colors, CMY(KW), actual true color printing
  • fast switching of materials, given they have similar extrusion temperature


  • filaments must be present in order to withstand backpressure even if not printed
  • filaments must be printed eventually, otherwise ‘bake’ in the hotend


  • controlling actual mixing in the chamber, e.g. creating turbulence to mix properly
    • creating turbulences may limit retraction, which is anyway not easy with mixing hotends


The filament channels:

Mounting options, plain mounting holes 3x 20mm, or plate with 3x 40mm holes:

and adding my Parametric Part Cooler:


Early prototype printed in cold white eSun PLA+ 0.25mm layer height (~1h 20m print time):

Adding nozzle, heat cartridge, heat thermistor, heatsink fan and pneumatic couplers PC4 M6:

and just testing my Parametric Part Cooler using 50×15 blower fan:

which very likely leads to have a some sort of thermal insulator aka silicon sock for lower part of the heat chamber and nozzle.

Metal Printing

The first attempt to order with WeNext using SLM failed, they were not able to find a way to print it without support, which was surprising as powder-based metal printing1) – the removal of support was not guaranteed, so I canceled the order.

  1. SLM powder-based printing requires support structure to counter act geometric distortion when sintering, when the piece shrinks.

The 2nd attempt with PCBWay – disclosure: they approached me a couple of weeks later to sponsor metal printing process, which I agreed on – also using SLM AlSi10Mg at first looked good at first, but then they also needed to add supports once the production step came close, and then I followed up and approved the production. The order was submitted November 5, and 14 days later the piece was at my door.

  • the print quality is excellent, the supports have been removed pretty much with little remains (between the cooling plates a few spikes remained but they have no functional influence)
  • a bit rough surface overall, more than I expected; which means, the inner holes are also rough and likely add friction to the motion of the filament

Preassembled with MK8 0.4mm nozzle, 30mm fan, heat cartridge and thermistor:

and 2x PC4-M6 threaded, with PTFE tubes:


My test rig:

  • Mellow Fly Super8 V1.2 running RepRapFirmware with two stepper motors attached driving two extruders in Bowden style
Test rig: Mellow Fly Super8 running RepRapFirmware 3.4.1, two steppers/extruders with custom mixing hotend printed in SLM AlSi10Mg (Aluminium)

Pass 1: First results

I heated to 50C°, 80C° and 100C°:

  • thermistor does poor job to measure actual temperature at the heatblock ~20C° off
  • heat conductivity to nozzle is very poor, barely heat up at all (when thermister reports 100C°) – very surprising
  • heat piles up from the heart cartridge cables
  • the fan cools barely, could be better

Pass 2: Adding thermal paste

  • adding thermal paste for the thermistor and nozzle thread
  • running M303 for 100C° and keeping it at 100C° for 10mins
  • lowest heatsink fin reaches 50C° – also connects to heatsink fan
  • nozzle looks cold (but when touching it it is hot), filament will definitely melt above
  • heat block has consistent heat distribution

Pass 3: Setting 150C°

  • heatblock is at ~120C° while thermistor reports 150C°
  • the filament pipe above the heatblock is at 100C°
  • the nozzle looks cold, but is hot at 105C° when touching with 2nd thermistor, an issue with reflective brass not properly showing proper thermal reading

Pass 4: Lowering Fan

As the lowest fin heats up significantly, as a first remedy I lowered the heatsink fan a bit:

  • lowest fin is cooler, also overall better air flow; the fins seems a bit too thick, thinner would be better
  • lower end of heat block has near set temperature, delta of just ~5C°

Conclusion Pass 1-4

  • make heatbreak section of pipes thinner
  • optionally have PTFE tubes until lower end of heatsink for smooth motion of filament
  • make fins thinner
  • lower heatsink fan by one fin

Iteration 2

After the tests, I changed the design slightly:

  • thinner pipes to lessen heat transfer to the heatsink
  • a few wings on the fins to increase heat dissepation
  • thinner fins so the air flows better

Submitted to PCBWay 2022/11/29 for manufacturing review, a day later I was informed of thin walls of the pipes near the heatbreak (<1mm) and I gave OK to manufacture.

Iteration 2 of Parametric Mixing Hotend

The thin heatbreak walls seemed to help:

  • ability to heat up to 210°C nominal, some parts reach 220°C, but nozzle is around 210°C
  • 30mm fan performs well
  • 40mm fan removes too much heat, no possible to reach 210°C anymore
  • heatbreak pipes are still too thick, too much heat flows away (hence 30mm vs 40mm fan)
  • first extrusion worked, but after 1-2min both channels are blocked, near lowest fin of the heatbreak, to clear the blockage, I removed the fan and heated to 180°C and allow entire hotend to reach ~90°C, then with 0.4mm needle and 1.8mm copper wire was able to clear the blocked section


Heatbreak is most critical, and has to be short and has to be a hard cut temperature gradient-wise – and 0.5mm wall thickness is still too much. So, regardless of cooling fan on the heatsink, if the heatbreak is too thick, too much heat creeps up or away – it’s not a matter of cooling capacity, but conductivity.


  • metal printed version (aluminium), done 2022/11/21
  • heating tests (on-going)
  • test prints with multiple filaments
    • 2 inputs, e.g. complementary colors (Black/White: Grey Shades, Yellow/Violet: Red Shades)
    • 3 inputs, e.g. CYM: saturated colors only
    • 5 inputs, e.g. CYMKW: full spectrum colors
  • silicon socks for all variants, as part cooler will introduce otherwise heating instabilities


Misc: XCR3D 3in1-S1 aka Bigtree ZSYong 3in1 (Switching/Non-Mixing) Hotend


  • 2022/09/10: designing part cooler for its
  • 2022/08/29: starting


The XCR3D 3in1 S1 aka Bigtree ZSYong 3in1 is a neat 3 in 1 out switching hotend (non-mixing):

XCR3D 3in1-S1 – 3in / 1out (switching, non-mixing)


  • cost effective with EUR 20-24 (2022/09) complete with heat cartridge, thermistor, 3xPTFE tubes, 30mm fan


  • nozzle / heatblock asymmetry: the heatblock extends right-side ~2mm
  • clumsy fan fastening between heatsink ribs
  • slightly overengineered otherwise, too much mass for the basic functionality

XCR3D 3in1-S1

BigTreeTech ZSYong 3in1

NF THC-01 3in1

Very similar, but with symmertric E3D V6 heatsink:

Clones of Clones

It seems to me, the this 3-in-1 hotend with hexagon heatsink, was cloned from NF THC-01 3in1, and likely engineered by a small company, and now brands like BigTreeTech, XCR3D and others purchase in bulk the hotend black/red anodized and their white brand stamp on the hotend.

What makes things truly confusing is that the hotends from China have terrible naming, e.g. “3in1” and “2in1” are used for switching and mixing hotends, which are quite different functionalities, and otherwise the name does not distinct designs.

Part Cooler

I adapted the Parametric Part Cooler using 50×10 blower fan for the XCR3D 3in1 S1 as well:

Download Part Cooler

As you can see on the illustration and photos, put the part cooler on the heatsink, and then 30mm heatsink fan on top. The part cooler itself requires 50x15mm blower fan.

It is a bit fiddly as there are no clear threads for the screws on the heatsink, so the first mounting is crucial to thread properly.

Marlin 2.0.x Configuration

In Configuration.h one has to update the thermistor type:

#define TEMP_SENSOR_0 5    // changed from 1 to 5


#define PID_FUNCTIONAL_RANGE 25   // changed from 10 to 25

recompile, upload/update firmware and then run via G-code console the autotune PID procedure:


and after 3-5 mins or so, when the autotune is done, save settings in EEPROM:


and one is done.


I really struggled to get decent quality prints first, as somehow the temperature reports were off by 40C°, and various Google searches gave the same wrong answers, the seller did not give proper detailed information about the thermistor either. Eventually at Amazon one customer gave the relevant information ATC Semitec 104GT-2/104NT-4-R025H42G and defining TEMP_SENSOR_0 5 in Marlin gave sane results.

Retraction settings are in my case 3mm at 70mm/s with apprx. 500mm long Bowden tube on my Ashtar C (CoreXY 400x400x380) and also Ashtar K #3 (300x300x360).

Ashtar K #3 with XCR3D 3in1-S1 hotend with 3 rolls of filament

I really like the switching filament solution close to the hotend, compared to other multi-material solutions where materials are switched far away from the hotend; e.g. switching material is faster, but one has to still purge one material/color by 30-50mm filament – so I tend to use the multi-material/color feature for fast switching colors for single material/color prints.

Following procedure I use when switching material:

  • heat up nozzle
  • purge 30-40mm regardless
  • retract 55mm at 70mm/s
  • switch to new material/color (e.g. “T1“)
  • push 55mm at 70mm/s forward
  • extrude/purge 30-40mm filament
  • start actual print
  • [ … ]
  • end print
  • retract 55mm at 70mm/s
  • switch to “T0
  • push 55mm at 70mm/s forward [note: not purging material/color transition]

so by default “T0” is ready to be printed. In order the print with the other materials, I have two macros with Print3r e3-t1 and e3-t2.

print3r --printer=ashtar-c-1 print cube.stl @e3-t1
print3r --printer=ashtar-c-1 print cube.stl @e3-t2


prepend_gcode="G91\nT0\nG1 E20 F100\nG1 E-55 F3000\nT1\nG1 E55 F3000\nG1 E30 F100\nG90\nG92 E0\n"
end_gcode="G1 Y{$machine_depth-10} F6000\nG92 E0\nG91\nG1 E-2 F2000\nM140 S0\nM104 S0\nG1 E-55 F3000\nT0\nG1 E55 F3000\nM84\nG90\n"

and ~/.config/print3r/macro/e3-t2:

prepend_gcode="G91\nT0\nG1 E20 F100\nG1 E-55 F3000\nT2\nG1 E55 F3000\nG1 E30 F100\nG90\nG92 E0\n"
end_gcode="G1 Y{$machine_depth-10} F6000\nG92 E0\nG91\nG1 E-2 F2000\nM140 S0\nM104 S0\nG1 E-55 F3000\nT0\nG1 E55 F3000\nM84\nG90\n"

The way it is composed: start_gcode + prepend_gcode + slicing G-code + end_gcode.

Sourcing / Purchase


As it happened to me several times, the hotend clogs up and the reason is often the filament is not hot enough, and when pulling back/retracting it forms a long pointy drag, and might break and the next cold filament jams in further down, but not enough to melt – it clogs up eventually.

First solution is to heat hotend at 240C° at least, not more than 250C° because of the PTFE – and try to push with filament on top, eventually some of the clogging might melt and free the nozzle.

Second solution is removing the lower part with heatbreak, heatblock, by opening the worm screws at the heatsink, and review the PTFE intake:


Virtual G-code Controller vgcodectl

Status: experimental, not yet released


  • 2022/11/29: covers 0.1.6 API
  • 2022/10/31: published
  • 2022/10/28: starting write up


As I was developing the 5-axis PAX printhead, and implement Inverse Kinematic (IK) for it in RepRapFirmware (RRF) for Duet3 board, the development speed was slow due the overhead to get to know the RRF written in C++, hence very verbose code, and the “recompiling, uploading, and reboot of the board” cycle to iterate the development – which turned out to be very slow and tedious.

My first remedy was to do a pre- or post-processor which takes tool coordinates and converts into motor positions applying IK, and Print3r supports it via declaring a post-processor like --post_something=something %i %o and then use with --post=something, but would only be a Print3r-centric solution.

So I thought, why not do a virtual serial device, and have a framework where the controller behaves like a physical one, but is pure software and thereby shorten development cycle to convert G-code coming out of a slicer or some software and then being processed and then sent to the 3D printer or robot – so the Virtual G-code Controller (vgcodectl) was born.

It’s main feature is that it operates bidirectional:

  • it takes input and optionally changes it, and outputs it to a file or a device
  • it takes output from a device, and forwards it back to the virtual serial to so it can read back transparently

in essence it operates as in bidirectional intermediary looking like a serial port and thereby can be integrated into existing G-code-based machine park.

slicer/console/controller ⇆ physical device

slicer/console/controller ⇆ vgcodectl ⇆ physical device

as a result the setup looks like a capability extended device:


  • simple to write G-code extensions with Python:
    • execute macros and calculate additional values
    • code execution from G-code
    • synchronize G-code with external devices, e.g. webcam
  • extend drivers/controller, like Inverse Kinematics (IK) which otherwise would run on the controller
  • live reloading of controller code: change printer/robot behavior while it’s processing G-code
    • fast iteration of code due scripting (no compiling, uploading or reboot)
  • supported platforms: Linux


  • line-based processing: one line comes in, one line or multiple lines comes out (future version might lift this constraint)


% vgcodectl -h
VirtualGcodeController 0.1.4 USAGE: [<opts>]
      --help or -h               this help
      --version                  display version & exit

      --verbose=<n>              increase verbosity
         -v or -vvv
      --quiet or -q              don't output to device or console anything unless an error

      --output=<device/file>     set output, e.g. /dev/ttyUSB0 or file or another device (default: /dev/stdout)
         -o <device/file>
      --controller=<ctl>         set controller (default: conf['output'])
         -c <ctl>
      --keep-orig or -O          enable to keep original g-code line as comment (default: off)
      --keep-comment or -C       enable to keep original comment (default: off)
                                    hint: --keep-orig/-O includes comment as well
      --serial-speed=<s>         set serial speed [baudrate] (default: 115200)
      --serial-timeout=<s>       set serial timeout [s] (default: 0.1)
      --check-code-timeout=<s>   set code checking timeout [s] (default: 1)
      --output-value-format=<fmt>  set output value format (default: .4f)
      vgcodectl --output=/dev/ttyUSB0 &
      cat test01.gcode > pass0.pty
      print3r --device=pass0.pty print tests/test01.gcode
      print3r --device=pass0.pty print --scad 'cube(20)'
      vgcodectl -o /dev/ttyACM0 -c gcode+ -Ov

Let’s try pass2 controller, which doubles X, Y and Z coordinates.

As first we start the controller:

% vgcodectl -c pass2 -O
== VirtualGcodeController 0.0.3 ==
; VirtualGcodeController 0.0.3, created 2022-10-28T13:23:23.513285
;   verbose = 0
;   output = "/dev/stdout
;   serial_speed = 115200
;   controller = "pass2"

In another terminal we take a sample G-code and send it into pass20.pty serial port (“pass2” plus the “0” indicates the first instance of pass2 controller):

% cat tests/test01.gcode > pass20.pty

and the vgcodectl outputs to stdout as it is the default:

G28 X0 Y0 ; G28 X Y
G92 ; G92   ; reset
G90 ; G90   ; abs coords
G0 X200 Y200 ; G0 X100 Y100
G1 X200 Y220 E1.2000 ; G1 X100 Y110 E1
M84 ; M84

As you notice, the new G-code is altered, e.g. X, Y and Z is doubled, the E is multiplied by 1.2 in this case, and the original G-code is appended as comment due the -O switch used (--keep_orig or -O).

If we did call vgcodectl with --output=/dev/ttyACM0 the end point would be a real 3D printer for example at /dev/ttyACM0.


% print3r --printer=ashtar-k-3 --device=pass20.pty print tests/test01.gcode
== Print3r 0.3.18 ==
print3r: conf: device pass20.pty, Ashtar K #3 E3 38x30x33, build/v 300x300x330mm, nozzle/d 0.4mm, layer/h 0.25mm, filament/d 1.75mm
print3r: authenticated "Ashtar K #3 E3 38x30x33" (8a09209a-1b93-11ed-861d-0242ac120002) at pass20.pty
print3r: print: 0h 00m elapsed, eta 0h 00m, 100.0% complete, z=0.00mm, layer #0, filament 0.00m  

as indicated, the pass20.pty operates bidirectional, reports back the proper UUID as requested by print3r and then sends G-code forward and does proper synchronous messaging back and forth.



Following controllers are available:

  • pass: it’s a simple pass-through changing no code, for debugging purposes
  • pass2: double X, Y and Z, and multiply E by 1.2
    • don’t use with actual 3D printer, only for debugging purposes
  • scale: scaling X, Y, Z and E, rather experimental / for debugging purposes
    • CLI argument: use --scale=<s> to set scale in , e.g. 0.8 (default: 1.0)
    • actually produces some working G-code
  • gcode+: writing low-level G-code and replace E automatically based on distance
    • use G0 X100 Y100 and then G1 Y110 E and the G1‘s extrusion will be calculated
    • actually produces some working G-code
    • CLI arguments:
      • --layer-height=<lh> [mm] (default: 0.2)
      • --line-width=<lw> [mm] (default: 0.4)
      • --filament-diameter=<d> [mm] (default: 1.75)
  • delta: implementing cartesian XYZ -> T1,T2,T2 motor angles, using Delta printer inverse kinematics
  • pax: implementing 5-axis inverse kinematics for PAX printhead
  • 5axis: generalized 5-axis driver, define forward kinematics, automatic inverse kinematics calculated:
    • open5x: Open5x
    • pax: PAX Printhead, same as pax controller, but defined within 5axis controller
  • macros: implementing RepRapFirmware’s M98 functionality


Writing A Controller

Note: vgcodectl is currently under heavy development, API subject to change a lot – check back this page frequently.

This covers vgtcodectl 0.1.6 API:

  • controllers/<controller> /:
      • must contain def _map(self,c=None) function, in there you can recalculate any existing G-code, the c contains a dictionary with all the G-code values, the function returns
        • a dict of the remapped variables, e.g. { "G": 0, "X": 100.0 } – note: order matters, make sure ‘G’ or ‘M’ key comes first for G or M commands
        • a string, e.g. "G0 X100.0" or G0 X100.0\nG1 X110 E1.2"
        • a tuple or list of
          • strings, e.g. [ "G0 X100.0", "G0 X110.0" ], each element is a line
          • dictionaries, e.g. [ { "G": 0, "X": 100 }, { "G": 0, "X": 110 } ], each element is a line
        • if None is returned, no change of G-code is made and the original data is passed on
        • if "" (empty string) is returned, nothing is passed on (mute)
      • optionally def __init__(self,conf=None) function be composed, where persistent state can be stored, and referenced in _map() then; the conf is the configuration of vgcodectl:
        • command line arguments vgcodectl --test="ABC" ... becomes conf['test'] available within __init__(), the controller profile profile.json is loaded and available as conf['profile']
        and if you store conf as self.conf then _map() has access to it as well with self.conf['test'] or self.conf['profile']['name']
    • profile.json (optional):
      • basic JSON file with follow keys:
        • name (string): full name of the controller
        • version (string): version of the controller, e.g. “0.1.0”
        • and any other key value default relevant for the controller

e.g. controllers/mine/

def __init__(self,conf=None):

def _map(self,c=None):
   if 'X' in c:
       c['X'] *= 2
   return c

then the controller can be referenced as such:

% vgcodectl -c mine -v
== VirtualGcodeController 0.0.7 ==
vgcodectl: 2022-10-31T06:48:14.026650: loading <mine> profile
vgcodectl: 2022-10-31T06:48:14.026705: loading <mine> code
vgcodectl: 2022-10-31T06:48:14.027444: created mine0.pty (/dev/ptmx,/dev/pts/7)
vgcodectl: 2022-10-31T06:48:14.027473: opening /dev/ptmx
; VirtualGcodeController 0.0.7,  2022-10-31T06:48:14.027622
;   verbose = 1
;   quiet = 0
;   output = "/dev/stdout"
;   keep_orig = 0
;   keep_comment = 0
;   serial_speed = 115200
;   serial_timeout = 0.1
;   check_code_timeout = 1
;   output_value_format = ".4f"
;   ignore_codes = ["M117"]
;   controller = "mine"

Scale Controller

The scale controller is just an experiment, to scale G-code with a factor:

% vgcodectl -c scale --scale=0.8 -o /dev/ttyACM0 &
% print3r --printer=ashtar-k-3 print --scad 'cube(20)' --fill-density=0 --device=scale0.pty
cube(20) in –-scale=.8, --scale=1, --scale=1.2 processed with scale controller


Misc: More Materials – Testing JLCPCB 3D Printing Services 2022


  • 2022/10/26: published finally
  • 2022/09/27: adding measurements and verdict
  • 2022/09/15: starting write up


Beside Fused Deposition Material (FDM) /  Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) aka extruding hot filament, there are more methods to 3D print:

  • SLA (stereolithography): resin based printing
  • SLS (selective laser sintering): laser sintering, like polyamid powder
  • MJF (material jetting): deposite material and binder in one go
  • SLM (selective laser melting): metal laser sintering, aka metal printing

and I choose JLCPCB which provides all four of them, whereas SLM only stainless steel is available as of 2022 – other 3D printing services provide wide-range of metals as well.


I ordered Pulley 20T 6ID (GT2 20 teeth 6mm inner diameter) as created via OpenSCAD Customizer, a piece which requires high accuracy and is mechanical stressed when in use, in following materials:

  • 8x PA12 aka Nylon aka Polyamid, black reflective (MJF), 1.04 EUR / pc
  • 8x 9000R resin, natural white (SLA), 1.04 EUR / pc
  • 8x 3201PA-F aka Nylon, dark gray matte (SLS), 1.04 EUR / pc
  • 1x 316L stainless steel (SLM), 8.30 EUR / pc

after 3 weeks the pieces arrived:

The overall quality of all pieces are excellent, regardless of automatic warnings I received while requesting the 3D printing task.

MJF: PA12 / Polyamid / Nylon

MJF has a nice finish, slightly reflective, deep dark, slightly grainy surface, and the top of the pulley is uneven, otherwise very precise.

  • diameter 16.1mm (+0.62%)
  • height 15.5mm (+0%)
  • cost EUR 1.04

SLS: 3201PA-F / Polyamid / Nylon

3201PA with SLS is a very good piece, dark gray matte, grainy surface, very precise.

  • diameter 16.05mm (+0.31%)
  • height 15.6mm (+0.65%)
  • cost EUR 1.04

SLA: 9000R Resin

9000R resin with SLA produced a very nice piece, best finish at the top (near perfection), milky white color (vs cold white or warm white), but as it turns out not very precise:

  • diameter 17.75mm (+4.68%)
  • height 16.1mm (+3.87%)
  • cost EUR 1.04

It is very surprising to see the SLA having the biggest imprecision of all the samples.

SLM: 310L Stainless Steel

316L stainless steel with SLM produced a nice piece as well, the top of the pulley is good, some unevenness where the top goes over the gear:

overall it’s grainy surface – indicating powder-based additive procedure. Holding the piece in the hand feels heavy compared the other materials.

  • diameter 16.0mm (+0%)
  • height 15.5mm (+0%)
  • cost EUR 8.30


The SLA / resin piece looked most smooth but it had the biggest imprecisions with over 3% in height and diameter – very surprising to me, it should comparatively be as precise as SLS and MJF. I cannot determine if it’s from the JLCPCB resin printer, or inherent of SLA.

SLS and MJF with Nylon performed expectedly very good, very sturdy and precise.

SLM stainless steel surprisingly very precise, yet unsuitable in real life application due the heavy weight.

Long Term Usage

I will update this part as soon long term (1-2 years) usage experience is available:

  • SLA: Resin 9000R: (not yet)
  • MJF: Polyamid/Nylon PA12: (not yet)
  • SLS: Polyamid 3201PA-F: (not yet)
  • SLM: Stainsteel 310L: (not yet)

Materials & 3D Printing Methods

Material vs Printing Methods

Comparing MJF Nylon vs SLS Nylon

PA12 vs 3201PA-F

Comparing Resins